Sunday, April 10, 2011

The New Grammys


So, as well all know, the Grammys kind of suck nowadays.

Seriously, though. The show is far too long, there's way too many awards, and the awards have pretty much become a joke. Essentially, winning a Grammy nowadays doesn't really mean a whole lot- it just points out that, yes, your music was popular last year and yes, you made a lot of money off of it. That's why it was such a huge surprise that Arcade Fire won album of the year this year- they're on a small label (Merge), and although they were a pretty big act last year, headlining festivals and the like, they definitely didn't sell anywhere near as many records as Katy Perry or Lady Gaga, their big-name contenders for Album of the Year (some people still have no idea who Arcade Fire is). Most years, the "album of the year" Grammy goes to whoever sat on top of the charts for the longest amount of time that year.

So the Grammys are undergoing a "radical change" this year. They organizers are cutting 31 categories, cutting the awards from 109 to 78, with many categories being merged and several being cut completely. The main goal is for the ceremony to go "gender blind"- there will no longer be "Best Female Pop Vocal" and "Best Male Pop Vocal" awards, just "Best Pop Vocal." They are also starting with 40 contenders per award now instead of 25. Grammy President Neil Portnow says that these radical changes are a way to "up the game for what it means to win a Grammy."

Some people are up in arms about this. "Oh, that's not fair! There has to be different categories for male and female singers!" Well, not necessarily. A good singer is a good singer- it really doesn't matter what gender you are. Why not have just one award? It makes things easier and really does make it mean more when you win one of these awards. The Grammys used to be a really big deal- now they're almost laughed at.

Another big change is the dropping of several categories, like Best Zydeco and Best Hawaiian album are gone (they were actually the most recent additions, too), having been consolidated with a couple of other awards into "Best Regional Roots Album."

Is it wrong to consolidate all of these genres into one category? It depends on how you look at it, really, and I'm not really sure if I agree with all of this or not. The male/female thing is totally fine in my opinion- I've actually thought they should consolidate those awards for quite some time. But getting rid of entire genre categories is a different story.

Let me know what you think of all of this in the comments, I'd love to have a discussion about this.

No comments:

Post a Comment